International Journal of Inactivism (now supplanted by Decoding SwiftHack)


Lambert-Monckton debate: we were wrong

[cite as: S. Stepanovich. 2010. Lambert-Monckton debate: we were wrong. Intl. J. Inact., 3:8]

As you may know by now, Deltoid blogger Tim Lambert had a debate on global warming with climate inactivist Christopher Monckton. Since Lambert accepted Monckton’s debate invitation unconditionally, and since the debate was widely publicized — for example, by the Australian Climate ‘Science’ Coalition and Joanne Nova’s blog — thus according to our global warming debate flowchart, inactivists should either proclaim victory for themselves, or throw a hissy fit and then proclaim victory for themselves. According to the flowchart, they might keep quiet about the outcome of a debate, but only if the debate wasn’t publicized widely in the first place.

However, we were wrong. Both the AC’S’C and Joanne Nova did keep quiet about the debate outcome, even though they’d widely announced the debate beforehand. We apologize for the error.



Americans beware: French ex-President wants to take away your guns! Oh noes!

cite as: F. Bi. 2009. Americans beware: French ex-President wants to take away your guns! Oh noes!
Intl. J. Inact., 2:76

British nobleman Christopher Monckton has a dire warning this June for all freedom-loving Americans: French ex-President Jacques Chirac wants to take away your guns by promoting the cruel hoax of ‘global warming’! Oh noes!

As Maurice Strong, Jacques Chirac and their ilk had always intended, the IPCC will emerge after [the UN Climate Change Conference at] Copenhagen as the prototype and nucleus of a world government. We have already seen this in the EU.

This is the same Monckton who claimed back in March that American President “Osamabamarama” has a

stated ambition of shutting down nine-tenths of the economies of the West and flinging us back to the Stone Age without even the right to light fires in our caves.


(And with this, I’d like to announce that there’s now another update to the genealogy of climate conspiracy theories.)


Internet Goracularities: Deus Reginam salvet

cite as: F. Bi. 2009. Internet Goracularities: Deus Reginam salvet. Intl. J. Inact., 2:56–62

The Goracle.

The Internet Goracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was:


And in response, thus spake the Goracle:


Next Page »

Create a free website or blog at