International Journal of Inactivism (now supplanted by Decoding SwiftHack)

2008/10/14

Sponsorship, my friends

Filed under: 2009 International Conference on Climate Change,news — stepanovich @ 19:10

cite as: F. Bi. 2008. Sponsorship, my friends. Intl. J. Inact., 1:155–156

CC by-sa 2.0

Source: RenaudPhoto on Flickr; License: CC by-sa 2.0

Tim Russo is miffed that certain happenings seem to be visible only to ‘citizen journalists’ with video cameras; as for me, I am miffed that some things aren’t visible even to citizen journalists on the ground, but are only spotted by nude bloggers in bathtubs.1 (This, of course, is just wrong.)2

So, what prompted me to write the above long-winded complaint was a page on the Heartland Institute’s web site, on how people can sponsor their upcoming climate inactivist conference. It’s the kind of jaw-dropping thing that made me think, “Oy, why am I the one writing about this? Why aren’t the ‘citizen journalists’ at DeSmogBlog, Gristmill, etc. on this already? Hey! Hey!”

Anyway, here’s an excerpt from Heartland’s information for sponsors, with emphases added by yours truly:

Conference co-sponsors receive the following benefits:

  • input into the program regarding speakers and panel topics
  • admission to all meals and sessions for up to 20 people
  • logo and organization info on all promotional material produced, including advertising prior to the event

There is no fee for sponsorship, but conference co-sponsors are asked to do the following:

  • place a link on the homepage of their Web sites to this site
  • send two or three emails to their membership/donor lists promoting the event
  • describe the event in a newsletter or online essay
  • get 20 people to attend the event as their guests

Yep, you read that right. First, sponsors will have a hand in deciding what the topics of the conference will be. I must say — my friends — this is totally above and beyond what actual serious scientific conferences do! (My experience is that the conference organizers will just give them some booth space to tout their stuff and recruit folks, and perhaps a time slot for them to talk about their fine work.)

Second, note that there’s no fee for sponsorship — yes, no fee — but “sponsors” are asked to spread the word about the conference and to get people to attend. That is, Heartland is looking for sponsorship not in the form of money, but in the form of noise. The more noise, the merrier.

And… one other thing: According to the registration information for the conference, there’s a 20% registration fee discount for signers of the “Oregon Petition”. I still can’t tell what Heartland’s trying to achieve with this move.

Footnotes

  1. Metaphorically speaking.
  2. As I wrote over at Russo’s blog, many ‘citizen journalists’ — whom I won’t name here — are under this weird impression that, when reporting an event, the first thing to do is to find an Internet connection. Nope; the first thing to do is to get your video cameras or PC microphones up and whirring. Activists, please, please keep that in mind.

Update 2008-10-15: Wadard quipeth, “They [‘Oregon Petition’ signers] can use their Frequent Denier’s point.”

Update 2009-01-08: Sponsorship, part deux.

Update 2009-01-30: Sponsorship, part trois.

Update 2009-05-01: Sponsorship for yet another Heartland ‘conference’.

Advertisements

8 Comments »

  1. Wouldn’t it be a hoot to have a DeSmog panel at Denialpalooza 2.0? Particularly if they create an anti-astroturf front to ‘sponsor’ Heartland and thus not be ‘expelled’ in advance? (Bonus points if they manage to get a speaker accepted, and that speaker’s someone knowledgable in climate, economics, and PR.) If nothing else, it will drain some of Heartland’s funding and place some of their “promotional materials” in the hands of folk who won’t destroy the evidence afterward.

    Or, for that matter, a presence from the International Journal of Inactivism in all of its highly professional and very respectable majesty?

    As for the Oregon Petition, it’s a stunt to draw more attention to the Petition, bank on the Petition’s popularity to bolster their attendance, plus reinforce the folk who weren’t duped into signing it or added to the list post-mortem.

    Comment by Brian D — 2008/10/14 @ 19:47 | Reply

  2. not be ‘expelled’ in advance?

    Hah! :-B

    Or, for that matter, a presence from the International Journal of Inactivism in all of its highly professional and very respectable majesty?

    Alas I don’t think I’ll be able to find 20 dupes who are willing to travel to New York for the event. 🙂

    it’s a stunt to draw more attention to the Petition, bank on the Petition’s popularity to bolster their attendance, plus reinforce the folk who weren’t duped into signing it or added to the list post-mortem.

    Well, I guess that’s the explanation… though this move still seems a bit weird to me.

    Comment by frankbi — 2008/10/15 @ 03:06 | Reply

  3. Hmm, at the time of the last conference this was announced to be held in London.

    Comment by Steve Bloom — 2008/10/16 @ 03:52 | Reply

  4. Yeah, a lot of sources were saying London… I’m guessing the Heartland folks changed their minds.

    Comment by frankbi — 2008/10/16 @ 04:02 | Reply

  5. […] | # | 0 The Heartland Institute has put up an initial list of the “co-sponsors” (ahem…) for its upcoming Fourth International ‘Conference’ on Climate Change. Have fun with […]

    Pingback by Heartland’s Initial list of “co-sponsors” for coming climate change ‘conference’ « International Journal of Inactivism — Mindless Link Propagation section — 2009/11/03 @ 15:57 | Reply

  6. […] Remember the Heartland Institute’s call for sponsorship — of a non-monetary, non-tangible kind — for their next climate inactivist conference, the self-styled “2009 International Conference on Climate Change”? […]

    Pingback by E pluribus sponsoribus vicenos « International Journal of Inactivism (now supplanted by Decoding SwiftHack) — 2010/09/24 @ 17:53 | Reply

  7. […] and this ‘conference’ has co-sponsors, in a non-monetary sense — just like the last one: Cosponsoring organizations are given a limited number of free tickets to the conference; if you […]

    Pingback by Two climate change ‘conferences’ in four months « International Journal of Inactivism (now supplanted by Decoding SwiftHack) — 2010/09/24 @ 17:54 | Reply

  8. […] the dogma of global warming alarmism, 60 more individuals have pledged their unofficial support and attendance for the second International Conference on Climate Change, bringing the total attendance above the […]

    Pingback by World Exclusive! More than 1,040 attendees unofficially pledged for New York global warming skeptic conference « International Journal of Inactivism (now supplanted by Decoding SwiftHack) — 2010/09/24 @ 17:54 | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: