International Journal of Inactivism (now supplanted by Decoding SwiftHack)


Worldwide climate crank journamalism II

cite as: F. Bi. 2008. Worldwide climate crank journamalism II. Intl. J. Inact., 1:133

It’s simple: a temperature change is “noteworthy” and “significant” if lots of blogs are talking about it! Alas, those “scientists” with their elitist ideas of “least squares fit” and so on don’t buy that:

Scientists have no data to prove whether or not the cooling is noteworthy. Josh Willis, a scientist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory says, “There has been a very slight cooling, but not anything really significant.”

— Christine Barnhill

As Stephen Colbert told us: corn + magic = gasoline. Now, replace corn with wood, and we have a winning formula:

Conservationists have been using biofuels for centuries, we call it “firewood” and it didn’t cost a cent of research.

— George Smith

So… L. Ron Hubbard was right all along?

After reading the USA TODAY article “What it means to think ‘green,'” I understand that being green means having your thoughts and attitudes align with the environmental agenda of the American Psychological Association.

— Anthony Clark


Leave a Comment »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Blog at

%d bloggers like this: