International Journal of Inactivism (now supplanted by Decoding SwiftHack)


Internet Goracularities: the "corn ethanol hoax" hoax

Filed under: Al Gore,bogonews,Internet Goracularities — stepanovich @ 19:30

cite as: F. Bi. 2008. Internet Goracularities: the “corn ethanol hoax” hoax. Intl. J. Inact., 1:15–16

The Goracle.

The Internet Goracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was:

O Great Goracle Most Wise Who Knows All, please enlighten this ignorant supplicant who now grovels at your feet: Did Al Gore (as US Senate president) cast the deciding vote for a bill in 1994 to encourage the use of corn ethanol?

And in response, thus spake the Goracle:

Holy Zeus, what’s wrong with you un-supplicants? You don’t want to use Google, you ask me silly questions to try to put me down, and you never send me offerings. If you guys like the “free market” so much, why don’t you actually send something over for my oracular services?

But hmm… I’m omniscient and I already know all the answers and I’m in a good mood anyway, so I’ll humour you this once. 1994 did you say? Are you referring to the old Energy Bill which was passed in 1992? But you know, I wasn’t even Senate president at that time, and the bill was passed by a very wide margin — I couldn’t cast a deciding vote even if I wanted to.

Or are you referring to this amendment which was tabled (postponed) in 1994 with the deciding vote cast by me?

No funds in this Act may be used to promulgate, implement, or enforce any requirement that a specified percentage of oxygen content of reformulated gasoline (as required by 42 U.S.C. 7545(k)) come from renewable oxygenates …

Yeah, I’ll grant that. But let’s see… current biofuel incentives are determined by the 2005 Energy Policy Act, which reads thus:



Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this paragraph, the Administrator shall promulgate regulations to ensure that gasoline sold or introduced into commerce in the United States (except in noncontiguous States or territories), on an annual average basis, contains the applicable volume of renewable fuel determined in accordance with subparagraph (B). […]


(i) CALENDAR YEARS 2006 THROUGH 2012- For the purpose of subparagraph (A), the applicable volume for any of calendar years 2006 through 2012 shall be determined in accordance with the following table:

Calendar yearApplicable volume of renewable fuel (in billions of gallons): 2006 — 4.0; 2007 — 4.7; 2008 — 5.4; […]

Note that this bill was passed by a Republican Congress and a Republican President. Not me.

And does this sound to you like I was uncritically encouraging corn ethanol, you lowly worm?

So the answer to your question is “yes, but it’s no longer relevant except as a talking point”.

You owe the Goracle a copy of Viscount Monckton’s medical records.

Update 2008-05-07: a correction adjustment — the 1994 amendment was tabled, not passed.



  1. It appears that the Goracle didn’t ponder enough on the “this amendment” link. Something about “411 Supplication required: Redo from start.”

    Comment by Brian D — 2008/04/30 @ 03:38 | Reply

  2. The Goracle was testing your faith and loyalty.

    (OK, corrected. :-B )

    Comment by frankbi — 2008/04/30 @ 10:37 | Reply

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at

%d bloggers like this: